Campaign Case Studies

Moments that changed the movement

In depth analyses of major Australian environmental campaigns: their timelines, tactics, the groups involved, and what they won or lost. Scroll the timeline to travel through the decades.

9case studies
1960 to 2024years covered

The timeline

Drag or scroll to explore
1979 to 1983
Concluded Victory wilderness
Franklin Blockade
Australia's last wild river held by people power, paddles and peaceful protest.
The Franklin Blockade was Australia's most consequential environmental campaign of the twentieth century, running from 1979 to 1983 and culminating in the federal government halting construction of the Gordon-below-Franklin hydroelectric dam in south-west Tasmania [1][2][3]. The campaign was led primarily by the Tasmanian Wilderness Society (TWS), founded in 1976 and rooted in the bitter experience of the Lake Pedder flooding in 1972, which had radicalised a generation of Tasmanian conservationists and demonstrated that conventional lobbying was insufficient against a state government and Hydro-Electricity Commission determined to industrialise one of the last great wilderness areas in the Southern Hemisphere [4][5]. When the HEC released its report in October 1979 recommending the damming of the Gordon River below its confluence with the Franklin, it initiated what the Forest History Society would later describe as 'the most important environmental battle to this present date' in Australian affairs [6]. The blockade itself, launched in December 1982, was the largest act of civil disobedience in Australian history. More than 2,600 volunteers committed to nonviolent direct action, 1,272 people were arrested for trespassing on the dam construction site at Warners Landing on the Gordon River, and at least 140 were imprisoned [7][8][9]. The campaign was coordinated with extraordinary skill: nonviolence training workshops were held before and during the blockade, a skilled media strategy brought the Franklin's beauty into Australian homes through photographs and television, and a sophisticated federal election campaign targeted marginal seats to deliver the environmental vote to Labor and the Democrats [10][11]. The photograph of the Franklin River on the cover of the 1981 Tasmanian Wilderness Calendar, with Bob Brown's photo credit, became one of the iconic images of Australian environmentalism [12]. The political resolution came through the March 1983 federal election, in which the Franklin became a central issue. The Tasmanian Liberal government's refusal of Prime Minister Fraser's offer of $500 million in compensation to cancel the dam proved decisive: as the Colong Bulletin later noted, 'Robin Gray's rejection of Fraser's compensation offer not to build the dam delivered the environmental vote across Australia to Labor' [13]. Bob Hawke's Labor Party won the election having pledged to stop the dam, and in July 1983 the High Court ruled by the narrowest possible margin of four to three that the Commonwealth had the constitutional power to prevent it, using the World Heritage Properties Conservation Act [14][15]. The ruling established for the first time that the Commonwealth could override state decisions on matters of international environmental significance [16]. The campaign reshaped Australian politics, conservation practice, and democratic culture. It gave birth to what became the Australian Greens, with Bob Brown elected to the Tasmanian Parliament in 1982 and four other Independent Greens elected in 1989 [17][18]. It established nonviolent direct action as a legitimate and effective tool in Australian conservation campaigns, directly inspiring the Terania Creek precedent and influencing every major campaign that followed, from the Daintree to Jabiluka [19][20]. As one participant wrote in Nonviolence Today, 'the more recent interest in nonviolent action was largely inspired by the successful campaign to Save the Franklin, the last wild river in Tasmania, in 1982-83' [21]. The Franklin blockade demonstrated that when enough people act together with moral clarity and disciplined nonviolence, even the most entrenched state power can be overcome.
Read case study
Concluded Victory forests
Fraser Island
How a handful of Queenslanders stopped American sandminers and put the world's largest sand island on the path to World Heritage listing.
In January 1971, a group of conservationists from Maryborough, Hervey Bay and Bundaberg gathered in the Noosa living room of retired educator Arthur Harrold to plan a response to newly advertised sandmining lease applications on Fraser Island, the world's largest sand island [1][2]. The organisation they created that night, the Fraser Island Defenders Organisation (FIDO), would spend the next six years fighting the most consequential environmental battle in Queensland's history. At stake was a 123-kilometre-long island of extraordinary ecological complexity -- a place of perched freshwater lakes, ancient rainforests growing in sand, towering satinay and brush box forests, and one of the southern hemisphere's most significant wild dingo populations [3][4]. The immediate threat came from two mining companies: the American corporation Dillingham and the Australian company Murphyores, which had lodged sandmining applications that would have allowed large-scale extraction of mineral sands -- rutile, zircon, ilmenite and monazite -- from Fraser Island's coastal dune systems [1][5]. These minerals, prized for the titanium, zirconium and thorium they contained, were in high international demand, and the Queensland government under Premier Joh Bjelke-Petersen was eager to support development [6]. The conservationists who formed FIDO understood that if the mining proceeded, entire sections of the island's dune systems, rainforests and freshwater lakes would be destroyed -- and that rehabilitation, as the miners claimed it could be done, was a fiction [2][7]. FIDO's campaign drew on a coalition of local residents, Brisbane-based environmental groups, the national Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF), and a sympathetic press. John Sinclair, the organisation's de facto leader and Honorary Project Officer, became the public face of the fight -- a tireless advocate who conducted media tours of the island, prepared detailed submissions, and was eventually named 'Australian of the Year' for 1976 by The Australian newspaper [8][9]. The legal battle was equally significant: in 1974 Sinclair appeared in the Queensland Mining Warden's Court to oppose the mining leases, was initially told he did not represent the public interest, appealed to the Queensland Supreme Court and lost, and then won a unanimous High Court ruling in May 1975 establishing that a single person could represent the public interest in such proceedings [10]. The decisive political intervention came from the federal level. The Whitlam Labor government, using the Environment Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act 1974, established a formal inquiry into sandmining on Fraser Island [11]. The Fraser Island Environmental Inquiry, presided over by Commissioner Dr John Hookey, held hearings through 1975 and early 1976, receiving submissions from FIDO, the mining companies, the Queensland government, Aboriginal representatives including Isaac Owens and Ethel Richards (introduced to the inquiry by FIDO), and many others [12][13]. The inquiry's three succinct recommendations -- which limited mining and laid the foundation for World Heritage status -- were handed down in 1976 [14]. The incoming Fraser Coalition government, despite Opposition resources spokespersons having previously signalled support for resumed mining, acted on the inquiry's recommendations and used export licensing powers to effectively stop sandmining on Fraser Island, with the final cessation occurring on 31 December 1976 [15][16]. The campaign's legacy extended far beyond Fraser Island itself. It demonstrated that community organisations could use Commonwealth constitutional mechanisms to override state government decisions in favour of resource extraction. It helped establish the precedent that one person could represent the public interest in legal proceedings. It seeded the arguments that would eventually lead to Fraser Island's World Heritage listing in 1992 [17]. And it trained a generation of Queensland conservationists in the arts of media campaigning, legal advocacy, political lobbying, and grassroots mobilisation that would be applied in subsequent campaigns from Cooloola to the Daintree [8][18].
Read case study
1971 to 1976
1998 to 1999
Concluded Victory nuclear
Jabiluka
A Mirarr-led movement of thousands defeated plans to mine uranium at the heart of a World Heritage wilderness.
The Jabiluka campaign was one of the most significant environmental and Indigenous rights campaigns in Australian history. From 1998 to 1999, an unprecedented coalition of Mirarr Traditional Owners, environment groups, students, trade unionists, peace activists, and ordinary citizens mobilised to stop Energy Resources of Australia (ERA) from opening a new uranium mine at Jabiluka, inside the World Heritage-listed Kakadu National Park in the Northern Territory. The campaign drew on decades of anti-uranium activism and represented a new high-water mark for the green-black alliance in Australia. [1][2][3] The blockade at the mine site, which ran from March to October 1998, saw over 5,000 people travel to Kakadu from across Australia. More than 500 people were arrested for non-violent civil disobedience, stretching the resources of the Northern Territory police and court system. Simultaneously, Jabiluka Action Groups (JAGs) operated in cities and regional centres nationwide, staging protests, occupying the offices of ERA's parent company North Ltd, and running a sophisticated corporate campaign. The campaign attracted international attention, with the European Parliament passing a resolution opposing the mine, and UNESCO's World Heritage Committee sending a high-level inspection team to assess threats to Kakadu. [1][2][4][5] The Mirarr people, represented by the Gundjehmi Aboriginal Corporation, provided the moral and legal core of the campaign. Senior Traditional Owner Yvonne Margarula became an internationally recognised figure, receiving the Goldman Environmental Prize. The Mirarr had opposed uranium mining on their country since the imposition of the Ranger mine in the 1970s; Jabiluka represented a second front in that long struggle. Their position was unequivocal: 'There are times in your life when you know in your heart what is right and what is not. Kakadu should not be mined for uranium. Jabiluka should not proceed.' [3][6][7] Although ERA completed a construction adit and began preparatory work, the combination of sustained grassroots pressure, international scrutiny, legal challenges, and ultimately the collapse of the uranium price forced the project to stall by September 1999. Rio Tinto, which took over North Ltd in August 2000, subsequently announced it did not support development of Jabiluka 'in the short term.' The uranium was eventually trucked back into the mine, and the site was rehabilitated. The mining lease over the site persisted for decades, but in July 2024 the Australian Federal Government finally announced it would not renew the mineral lease, and the land was incorporated into Kakadu National Park. [1][8][9][10] The Jabiluka campaign endures as a touchstone for Australian activists. It proved that mass non-violent direct action, international solidarity, and Indigenous leadership could halt a project backed by a federal government and a major transnational mining corporation. It established models of green-black alliance, affinity group organising, and corporate campaigning that subsequent campaigns, from the fight against Adani's Carmichael mine to campaigns against nuclear waste dumps, have consciously drawn upon. [2][11][12]
Read case study
Concluded Partial nuclear
Kakadu and Ranger Uranium
How the Fox Inquiry and the Ranger mine galvanised Australia's national anti-uranium movement.
The campaign against uranium mining in the Alligator Rivers region of the Northern Territory ran for half a century, from the discovery of uranium at Ranger in 1969 and 1970 to the surrender of the Jabiluka lease into Kakadu National Park in 2024 [8][16]. It was at once an environmental campaign, an Aboriginal land rights struggle, and the centre of Australia's anti-nuclear movement [6][10]. The campaign crystallised around the Ranger Uranium Environmental Inquiry, the Fox Inquiry, which held hearings from 1975 and reported in 1976 and 1977 [7][8]. The Inquiry acknowledged the opposition of the region's Aboriginal people but recommended that mining could proceed under conditions, and the Fraser government approved Ranger in 1977 [8]. Across the country a mass movement arose in response. The Movement Against Uranium Mining and the Friends of the Earth anti-uranium collectives drove rallies, union bans, and civil disobedience through the late 1970s [3][6][10]. Despite this, Ranger was built and began production in 1981, and a second mine operated at Nabarlek from 1979 [8][11]. The Mirarr Traditional Owners, on whose country the mines sat, had opposed them from the start, but the Ranger mine was imposed on them through a land council agreement they regarded as coerced [1][4]. For two decades the region became, in the campaign's words, a uranium province inside a World Heritage national park [1]. The campaign reached its climax at Jabiluka. After the Howard government scrapped Labor's three-mines policy and approved a second mine at Jabiluka in 1997, the Mirarr, led by senior Traditional Owner Yvonne Margarula and the Gundjehmi Aboriginal Corporation, called for support [1][4]. A permanent blockade was established at Kakadu from 23 March 1998, and over eight months more than 600 people were arrested in one of the largest land rights and environment campaigns Australia had seen [2][5]. The campaign combined the blockade with a Federal Court challenge, international lobbying, and shareholder activism against ERA's parent company North Ltd and its banks [1][5]. The outcomes were mixed but, in the long run, decisive. Ranger was never stopped and operated until 2021, but Jabiluka was never built [5][16]. ERA deferred the project in 1999, and from 2005 development required Mirarr consent, which was never given [5][16]. The Koongarra deposit was added to Kakadu in 2013, Ranger entered rehabilitation, and in 2024 the Jabiluka lease was not renewed and the land was incorporated into Kakadu National Park [16]. The country the Mirarr had fought to protect was, at last, returned to protection.
Read case study
1975 to 2024
1967 to 1972
Concluded Defeat rivers
Lake Pedder
Australia's most beautiful lake was drowned by a government that refused to listen, and a movement that refused to give up.
Lake Pedder was a glacially formed alpine lake in the southwest wilderness of Tasmania, celebrated for its extraordinary pink quartzite beach, unique endemic species, and geomorphological significance as one of the last great temperate wilderness areas on earth [1][2]. In 1967, the Tasmanian Hydro-Electric Commission (HEC) tabled a proposal to flood the lake and surrounding valley as part of the Gordon River Power Scheme, a vast hydro-electricity development intended to attract heavy industry to the state [3]. The proposal triggered one of the most significant environmental campaigns in Australian history, mobilising conservationists, bushwalkers, scientists, artists, and ordinary citizens across the country and internationally between 1967 and 1972 [4][5]. The campaign was led primarily by the Lake Pedder Action Committee (LPAC), formed in 1971 as public awareness of the imminent flooding reached a national audience [6]. Activists drew on photographs, personal testimony, and emerging wilderness science to argue that the lake's loss would be irreversible and that the HEC's economic case was manipulated and incomplete [3][7]. Despite mass petitions, international attention, the resignation of the Tasmanian Attorney-General over the matter, and the formation of the United Tasmania Group, widely regarded as the world's first green political party, the campaign failed to stop the flooding [8][9]. By July 1972, the Edgar, Serpentine, and Scotts Peaks dams had been completed and Lake Pedder began to disappear beneath waters that would eventually form an impoundment nearly forty kilometres long [3]. The newly elected Whitlam Labor government subsequently appointed the Burton Committee of Enquiry in February 1973, which found the decision-making process deeply flawed and recommended a moratorium, but Premier Eric Reece of Tasmania rejected this recommendation and the flooding proceeded [3][7]. The loss was traumatic for the Australian conservation movement but its consequences proved transformative: it catalysed the formation of the Tasmanian Wilderness Society, shaped the successful Franklin River campaign of the early 1980s, and prompted the Australian government to sign the World Heritage Convention [1][6][10]. The Lake Pedder campaign occupies a foundational place in Australian environmental history. It was the moment when the old model of polite lobbying through institutional channels finally broke, and a new generation of activists, willing to take their arguments directly to the public, to use photography and emotion as legitimate political tools, and to challenge the economic orthodoxies of development, came into their own [1][4][11]. The lake itself remains submerged, but the campaign it inspired has never ended: a restoration movement continues to the present day, arguing that the original Lake Pedder can and should be brought back to life [12][13].
Read case study
Concluded Victory mining
Save Straddie
How the Quandamooka people and their allies ended half a century of sand mining on the world's second largest sand island.
For more than fifty years, North Stradbroke Island, known to its Quandamooka Traditional Owners as Minjerribah, was mined for mineral sands. Companies including Consolidated Rutile stripped rutile, zircon and other heavy minerals from the dunes of an island that holds freshwater lakes, wallum heath, and thousands of years of unbroken Aboriginal connection [1][2]. The campaign to end that mining, loosely gathered under the call to Save Straddie, ran across decades and brought together Quandamooka people, conservation groups, students and local residents [1][6]. The island's Aboriginal community was central from the beginning. Figures such as Oodgeroo Noonuccal, who grew up on Stradbroke, and the Minjerribah Morgumpun Elders in Council asserted the authority of Traditional Owners over their country, especially after the Mabo decision opened the way to native title [3][5]. Naturalists and Aboriginal people pointed to incidents like the 1982 landslip of mined sand into the mangrove beds of Moreton Bay as evidence that rehabilitation claims could not be trusted [2]. Through the 1990s the campaign took a public, educational form, including the Minjerribah Sandmining Cycle, a coalition bike ride from Brisbane to Point Lookout that traced the journey of the island's sand to a city glass factory and back [1]. Conservation organisations including The Wilderness Society and the Queensland Conservation Council, student environment collectives, and the Queensland Greens lent the effort capacity and profile [1]. The long running Fraser Island Defenders Organisation, having helped stop sand mining on Fraser Island in 1976, broadened its work to Straddie and joined a coalition pressing the Queensland Government not to renew the island's expired mining leases [6][7]. The politics turned sharply in the 2010s. After a planned phase-out was set in train, the Newman Liberal National government moved in 2012 to extend the expired leases by almost a quarter of a century, a decision that campaigners linked to mining industry support for the government [8]. The 2015 Queensland election removed that government, and the incoming Labor government committed to repealing the pro-mining legislation, setting the island back on the path to a cessation of mining [9]. The outcome was a victory for the Quandamooka people and the conservation movement. Native title over Minjerribah was recognised, large parts of the island were returned and protected, and sand mining finally ended in 2019 [9][16][17]. The campaign stands as a rare example of a sustained, Indigenous-led environmental effort that outlasted the companies and governments arrayed against it.
Read case study
1960 to 2019
1979 to 1982
Concluded Victory forests
Terania Creek
Australia's first forest blockade stopped the bulldozers and changed a nation.
In August 1979, hundreds of people gathered in a rainforest basin near Lismore in northern New South Wales to physically prevent the Forestry Commission from logging one of the last intact stands of lowland subtropical rainforest in Australia [1][2]. The four-week blockade at Terania Creek was the culmination of five years of organising, petitions, public meetings, and failed attempts through conventional channels [3][4]. When the bulldozers arrived, local residents, alternative settlers, conservation activists, scientists, and supporters from across the country stood in their path, sat beneath the machines, and refused to move [5][6]. Thirty-nine people were arrested [7][8]. The blockade was not simply a local dispute about trees. It marked a fundamental shift in how Australians fought for the environment [9]. Terania Creek was, as one account put it, 'the first time anywhere in the world, a direct action in defense of the rainforests took place' [10]. The tactics proved that ordinary people, without legal standing or political power, could halt industrial machinery through the sheer force of nonviolent commitment. Those tactics would be refined and deployed across Australia for decades: at the Franklin River in Tasmania, at the Daintree in Queensland, in East Gippsland and across the forests of New South Wales [11][12]. The ecological stakes were enormous. The Terania Creek basin contained approximately 400 hectares of unlogged forest, of which 170 hectares was rainforest of a type that had once blanketed hundreds of thousands of hectares of coastal New South Wales but had been reduced to scattered remnants [13][14]. Radiocarbon dating of brush box trees at Terania Creek placed individual specimens at between 1,200 and 1,700 years old [15][16]. These were not simply old trees: they were living components of an ecosystem that scientists described as among the most diverse and ancient on earth [17]. The immediate political outcome of the blockade was not a straightforward victory. The NSW Government appointed a royal commissioner, Simon Isaacs QC, to hold a formal inquiry into the proposed logging [18]. The inquiry ran through 1980 and 1981, and conservationists emerged convinced that Isaacs was predisposed to recommend logging proceed [19]. He ultimately did, subject to conditions. But the NSW Government under Premier Neville Wran chose to ignore that recommendation [20]. In October 1982, Wran announced a statewide rainforest policy that halted logging across the remaining rainforest areas and added approximately 51,000 hectares to the conservation estate [21]. The Nightcap National Park, encompassing the Terania Creek basin, was gazetted in 1983 [22]. The legacy of Terania Creek extended far beyond the protection of a single valley. It demonstrated that the conservation movement could win through direct confrontation as well as through courts and committees [23]. It incubated a generation of activists who carried the skills and spirit of Terania into campaigns across eastern Australia [24]. And it contributed ultimately to the listing of the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia as a UNESCO World Heritage Area, a recognition that the forests protesters had put their bodies on the line to save were among the most significant on the planet [25].
Read case study
Concluded Victory forests
Washpool
How sustained grassroots action saved the largest remaining warm temperate coachwood rainforest wilderness in north-east New South Wales.
The Washpool campaign is one of the great sustained conservation victories in Australian environmental history, spanning from the late 1970s to the late 1990s and combining grassroots direct action, landmark litigation, political lobbying, and Indigenous cultural rights advocacy. What began as the Colong Committee's scientific identification of Washpool's wilderness values in 1976 became a multi-decade struggle to protect the largest remaining warm temperate coachwood rainforest wilderness in north-east New South Wales from a timber industry that held legal allocations dating to 1960. [3][17] The first decisive victory came with the NSW Government's Rainforest Decision of October 1982, which created Washpool National Park from approximately 50,000 hectares and removed 117,000 hectares of north coast forest from the timber supply. [17] Bob Carr declared a Washpool rainforest wilderness area on 15 May 1985, and the following year Washpool was included in Australia's World Heritage nomination of the Central Eastern Rainforest Reserves. [18] But significant areas to the north of the new national park remained in the Washpool State Forest, subject to ongoing logging operations and Forestry Commission road-building that threatened to destroy wilderness values before formal assessment could be completed. [1][3] The founding of the North East Forest Alliance on World Environment Day 1989 at the Big Scrub Environment Centre in Lismore opened a new and more confrontational phase of the campaign. [1] NEFA combined non-violent direct action with systematic litigation: within weeks of its Green Summit on 6 August 1989, it had mounted the first North Washpool blockade, resulting in 14 arrests and the suspension of Forestry Commission road-building due to the presence of sacred sites. [1] The legal work of John Corkill, supported by the Legal Aid Commission and the fundraising organisation Green Appeal Inc, produced an interlocutory judgment from Justice Hemmings in 1990 and a decisive win when the Forestry Commission's appeal was dismissed on 1 November 1991. [8][10] The March 1991 North Washpool Agreement established a formal rehabilitation scientific committee and a logging moratorium, and in December 1993 Premier John Fahey declared North Washpool as one of seven wilderness areas gazetted that year. [15][18] Further wilderness extensions in September 1996 added 6,600 hectares to the Washpool wilderness, and the Dunphy Wilderness Fund acquired more than 10,000 hectares of former grazing leases in the area for long-term conservation. [18][25] The campaign demonstrated that a small but determined coalition of conservationists, lawyers, and Indigenous rights advocates could, through sustained pressure over many years, permanently protect one of Australia's most significant wilderness remnants.
Read case study
1980